🎾 The Tennis Stance¶
Giới Thiệu¶
The Tennis Stance — tài liệu 11 trang từ thư viện sách tennis.
Tóm tắt nội dung (trích từ tài liệu gốc): Revolutionary Tennis Tennis Instruction That Makes Sense Grand Unification Theory: the tennis stance � Mark Papas mark@revolutionarytennis.com There exists the concept of perfect tennis form, and this happens when you hit the ball "just right." That is for the most part prior to contact you moved forward into the ball just right, Step 1, at contact your feet were just right to one another and to the ball's flight line, Step 2, you were neither sideways nor open to the ball at contact and linear momentum from the body empowered the swing, not angular momentum, Step 4. (And you hit the ball on t
Lưu ý: Nội dung dưới đây được trích xuất tự động từ PDF gốc tiếng Anh, giữ nguyên ngôn ngữ để bảo toàn độ chính xác kỹ thuật.
Nội Dung Gốc (Tiếng Anh)¶
Revolutionary Tennis
Tennis Instruction That Makes Sense
Grand Unification Theory:
the tennis stance
� Mark Papas
mark@revolutionarytennis.com
There exists the concept of perfect tennis form, and this happens when you hit the ball "just right."
That is for the most part prior to contact you moved forward into the ball just right, Step 1, at
contact your feet were just right to one another and to the ball's flight line, Step 2, you were
neither sideways nor open to the ball at contact and linear momentum from the body empowered
the swing, not angular momentum, Step 4. (And you hit the ball on time.) Doing things just
right, then, finds you in the Tennis Stance, a fixed relationship of the feet and body and weight
shift into the ball at contact.
The configuration of the arm at contact is discussed in the Step pertaining to the stroke and not
here, and body weight shift is found in Step 4. The big picture here belongs to the feet, the body,
and their relationship to the angle of the ball that moves away from you.
By understanding the Tennis Stance you will be able to strengthen your weakest stroke. You'll be
able to understand why something isn't working right and you'll be able to do something about it
beyond what's been discussed in other Steps. Revolutionary Tennis breaks new ground here.
THE TENNIS STANCE
The incoming angle of the ball's flight line has
everything to do with achieving the Tennis Stance
because it predetermines the direction in which to
move and how the feet, the body, and the racket
will line up. Diagram G-1 shows the Tennis
Stance. The ball hit in this example has been
struck from the behind the middle of the
opponent's baseline, and the player was able to
move forward easily. Both feet are pointing at the
ball and you step into it for contact with the front
foot, Step 2, the racket is at a right angle to the
ball's flight line to hit through the middle of the ball, Step 6, and the hitting zone between the
width of the feet is defined by the dotted lines extended from the feet, Step 3.
If this looks familiar to you it's because the feet are in the Forward Stance, Step 3, and this forms
the foundation to the Tennis Stance. The Tennis Stance is the Forward Stance linked on a
particular angle to the angle of the ball: you're not stretching, you're not too close, you're "just
right."
The particular angle at which the Forward Stance is linked with the angle of the ball is shown in
diagram G-2. G-2 compares the relationship of a right hander's forehand feet to each other, and
their relationship to the angle of the ball. The bottom half is merely a flipped version of the top
half, and I did it because you often see pros from this perspective. The red areas represent the
angles involved, and the dotted line goes all the way up to the opponent's contact spot,
representing the zero degree baseline.
In the Forward Stance, G-2 left top, both feet have been moving into the ball's angle per Step 1.
Here the feet are not spread that far apart from each other when viewed from above.
However, if you step across, shown in G-2 right, top and bottom, the feet no longer are moving
into the ball's angle. Here the feet spread apart too much and the Forward Stance is
compromised.
� Mark Papas Grand Unification Theory p.2 /11
"JUST RIGHT"
When the angle of the ball changes, the Tennis
Stance remains the same with respect to the ball but
your perspective with the court changes. This
change is responsible for being able to hit "just
right" under any circumstance: returning deep balls
into your corner, down the line, hitting inside out,
returning serve, volleys. Let me show you how this
works.
G-3 is a full court view of G-1 to hit "just right."
The court is drawn to scale, but the player is not so
you can see things better. I should have placed the
little player closer to the center for contact, but I
wouldn't have been able to fit both backhand and
forehand in one diagram.
In G-3 the angle of the ball represents a "simple"
rally that is familiar to you. It's an easy ball that
started from the middle of the opponent's court, the
court lies straight ahead of you, you move forward
into the ball, and contact is made when it's neither
too close nor too far away. Just right.
But of course not every rally is of the easy, normal
kind. More often than not you're dealing with a ball
hit crosscourt against you or down your sideline.
How, then, do you change your perspective on the
court in order to maintain the Tennis Stance?
� Mark Papas Grand Unification Theory p.3 /11
ANGULAR PERSPECTIVE
Diagram G-4 is different than G-3. Here the ball is
struck from the opponent's corner, not from the
middle, and it the goes crosscourt to your own
corner, not close to your own middle. But while the
angle of the incoming ball in G-4 is different than in
G-3, the player remains the same with respect to the
court as in G-3.
G-4 does not replicate the Tennis Stance (G-1 and
G-3) because relative to the ball's flight line the feet
and body are turned too much to the side (and the
racket face is not at a right angle to the ball's flight
line). The difference is slight and not easy to see,
but I'll soon overlap the two. Yes it's true you could
make contact earlier to be at a right angle to the
flight line, and that would help a lot, but the point is
here your body is not optimally aligned with the ball
(the Tennis Stance) as it was when hitting "just
right" in the "simple" rally in the earlier examples.
In order to reproduce the "just right" Tennis Stance
for diagram G-4, we go to diagram G-5. In G-5 the
player's alignment with the ball's flight line now
matches what is was in G-1 and G-3. I picked up
and turned the player on the left slightly clockwise
(and the player on the right counter clockwise) to
reproduce the Tennis Stance from G-1 and G-3
because the angle of the ball changed. The
readjustment leaves the player more "open" to the
net than before, yet s/he is hitting and lining up with
the ball "just right" under the "normal" rally as in
G-1,3. What has changed is the player's perspective
on the court.
Below G-5 I superimposed the readjusted Tennis
Stance (in red) over the G-4 stance that is too
turned to one side (in black).
� Mark Papas Grand Unification Theory p.4 /11
BATTER UP
Baseball offers a clarifying perspective. Say you're at home plate, diagram G-6-A, in the batter's
stance, sideways, one foot ahead of the other, and the pitcher is straight away to the left side of
your body. The batting stance is the player's alignment to hit a baseball thrown over home plate.
But what if the pitcher decided to move to third base before pitching to you, what would you do?
Would you remain in your stance, G-6-B, and be too turned to the side to handle the ball well, or
would you readjust your stance to maintain your alignment with the ball thrown at you, G-6-C?
The answer is you'd readjust.
Yes, some baseball players open or close their stance, but it's safe to say the batting stance reflects
a particular angle of the feet and body with respect to flight path of the incoming ball.
GRAND UNIFICATION THEORY
Diagrams G-7 and G-8 unlock the hidden richness to your game. They show how to change your
perspective on the court to maintain the Tennis Stance as the angle of the ball changes.
Let's get our bearing straight here first. The descriptions "more open, regular, turned, turned
more, really turned" are depictions of your perspective with regard to the court. Depending on
where the ball is coming from, to execute the Tennis Stance you run the gamut of being really
turned with regard to the court, position number 5, to being more open to it, number 1.
� Mark Papas Grand Unification Theory p.5 /11
G-7 and G-8 help explain how to position yourself to return balls hit crosscourt into your
backhand corner, how to position yourself when running around your backhand to hit inside out,
how to position yourself when returning serve for singles or doubles. Even though all positions
are aligned equally with the ball and are "just right," you are most comfortable with position
number 2, "regular," because you are neither turned too much nor too little with regard to the
court ahead of you. You have to get used to being more turned and less turned.
G-7 and G-8 act as troubleshooting diagrams. As an example, how do you achieve the Tennis
Stance for a ball hit crosscourt against you to your backhand corner? G-8, position number 1,
shows the position of the Tennis Stance with regard to the court. It is the "more open" position.
Unfortunately, the tennis establishment often advises you "turn" or "turn more" to deal with the
ball crosscourt into your backhand corner, positions number 3 in G-8, or number 4 in G-8A. This
is like our baseball batter in the G-6-B example not adjusting when the pitcher moved over to
third base to pitch. Your alignment is so out of whack the only chance you've got to get a good
shot off is a lucky one.
� Mark Papas Grand Unification Theory p.6 /11
Time and time again students diligently "turn" when a ball goes crosscourt to their backhand, and
time and time again the resulting shot is weak. "You are over-turned," I say to the student.
"Open up with respect to the net and you'll be aligned properly with the ball." I love watching the
smile that follows their solid crosscourt return to my own backhand.
HOW TO GET THERE FROM HERE
How do you wind up in the Tennis Stance if the angle of the ball is different every single time?
Footwork. Better yet, your footwork changes with regard to the court, just like the Tennis
Stance. It's perspective again.
Diagram G-9 shows G-3 but with just the feet, where the opponent's contact was behind the
middle of the baseline. Per Step 1, the 90 degree mark determines whether you're moving into
the ball or away with the ball, and the curved arrows represent in broad and general form the
direction of movement into the ball. The actual direction of the feet here is unimportant, they are
merely illustrative to serve a purpose, and their scale and placement are decidedly inexact.
� Mark Papas Grand Unification Theory p.7 /11
From Step 2 you know that to remain in the middle
of that angle of possibilities you need to reposition
yourself either to the right or left of the center
hashmark. It is extremely rare the ball is hit at you
literally from the middle of your opponent's
baseline.
To see how the perspective of your footwork
moving forward into the ball changes with regard
to the court, move the opponent's contact spot
from G-9 over to the corner. You're left with
diagrams G-10 and G-11.
Movement. You no longer are facing the
rectangular court head on, so instead of moving
forward into the court in equal measures either to
the left or right it's going to be lopsided.
Responding to the ball hit crosscourt against you,
you need to move more inward toward the baseline
(and at times inside it) to ensure moving forward
into the ball.
Moving towards the baseline here is difficult to do
when the ball is perfectly deep, yes, but it's possible
when your ready position begins five feet behind the
baseline (the pros do). A deeper ready position
than the one in shown in G-10 and G-11 (two and a
half feet) pulls that right angle mark farther back
and behind the baseline, giving you more room with
which to move into the ball. Maybe now it's clearer
how hitting deep into the opposite corner makes it
more difficult for your opponent to move forward
into the ball.
Players often respond to the opponent's crosscourt
shot by turning with respect to the court and net and
moving parallel to the baseline, but the geometry
clearly shows in this direction you're turning too
much to the side and not moving into the ball.
Turning and moving parallel here only makes it more
difficult, if not impossible, for you to align your feet
and body correctly with the ball. A weak shot
follows.
Responding to the ball hit down the far sideline
against you, moving forward into the ball means
moving behind the baseline or even parallel to it.
Too often players equate moving into the ball with
� Mark Papas Grand Unification Theory p.8 /11
getting inside the baseline, but that's not the case here unless the ball is really short. Since this
shot by your opponent can get by you faster (it travels less distance), the upside is you're giving
yourself more time to deal with it by moving behind the baseline rather than inside it.
This angular perspective defines how to move into the ball on volleys and returns of serve, and
will be outlined in their respective Step.
THE EXTREME SHOTS
So far the angle involved in the diagrams has been a reasonable one, not an extreme one you may
encounter on occasion. An extreme angle means the ball goes crosscourt more sharply, or hugs
the sideline more (2 feet from the sideline in the following diagrams). If you try to take 4 steps on
groundstrokes with these extreme shots you wind up turning sideways to the ball instead of
moving into the ball. And then you think, "if only I could have started over closer to the ball
maybe I could moved into it instead of turning over sideways." You're right, you translate your
ready position over a little to that one side before executing your 4 step footwork pattern. Here's
how.
To translate your ready position over to the one side
you take a quick 2 step sidestep. Diagrams G-12 and G-13 show this effect. The circle with the
feet represents your initial ready position, and the second ready position with the feet represents
what's happened after taking the 2 step sidestep to one side or the other. Once accomplished, you
can move into the ball with your 4 step footwork pattern or at the least avoid turning sideways.
Of course, you know this takes extra effort.
This is the only time sidestepping as part of your movement toward the ball is required, to get
your ready position over a bit with regard to the ball so you can arc into it. This is an exception
to Revolutionary Tennis' 4-step general movement pattern due to the extreme situation, though
it's still an even number of steps. Remember, the tennis establishment wants you to sidestep,
sidestep, step forward (to the net or the target) and hit as your general movement pattern. This
casserole of a footwork pattern not only in part tries to promote the exception as the rule, but as
shown in Step 2 this pattern is arrhythmic, covers ground inefficiently, promotes imbalance,
� Mark Papas Grand Unification Theory p.9 /11
promotes an open stance, and sends you and your momentum off to the side instead of into the
ball.
You have also heard and read that your front foot on your backhand should step toward the net
post on that same side. This advice works only when the ball is coming at one particular angle,
but since tennis reality finds the ball constantly flying across the court at a different angle, the
front foot is always stepping differently on the court. The front foot is always stepping at and into
the ever-changing-angled ball. Thus a reference point on the court can not serve for any aspect of
the game since they are fixed, like a dance floor, while the ball, and you, constantly dance
together.
DRILLS, CLINICS, CAMPS
The most popular drill at camps and clinics is where the feeder stands up at the net and feeds a
series of balls to a student at the baseline who runs across the court. Sadly, this kind of
arrangement where the student runs parallel to the baseline does not reinforce the idea that there
is a relationship between the student's angle of approach into the ball with regard to the ball's
flight angle with the student. The result is you're not practicing the Tennis Stance, you're not
strengthening the muscle memory at the foundational level responsible for success.
Diagrams G-14 and G-15 illustrate how your stance needs to adjust per the ball's angle when a
player feeds you the ball from the middle of the court up at the net (or from anywhere for that
matter). As you can see, it's definitely not a case of blindly running parallel to the baseline, or of
turning and stepping in the same fashion for all three balls. If you can not avoid this drill
altogether, the solution is to start a good five feet behind the line and be really turned for the first
ball, move inward inside the baseline for the second one, and then continue arcing inward for the
� Mark Papas Grand Unification Theory p.10 /11
third ball. Of course the feeder has to cooperate, each ball being successfully shorter.
If the feeder hits the last ball deep into your corner, you're being asked to hit on the run, which is
okay to run your behind off. But if you want to learn how to handle that tough ball in a real rally,
you'll need to assume the body and feet angle from the "more open" position of diagrams 7 and 8
above, which is basically impossible to do in this drill unless the feeder waits for you to square up
and sidestep past the center mark before feeding the ball and then asking you to move into it
appropriately.
"IT'S THE BALL, STUPID," by unknown tennis bum
You reposition with, you move forward into, you angle into with, you shift your weight into, you
swing head-on into, THE BALL.
And don't forget how to watch the ball from Step 7.
The angle with which your head turns to track the ball
and the direction in which the eyes look to see the ball
at contact also adjust with regard to the court's
perspective, diagram G-16. Your head and contact
spot might be more turned, or more open to the court
than you're used to but you are keying on the ball, per
the angle of its flight line.
The Grand Unification Theory adds more elegance to an already elegant game. Play within this
elegance and your tennis friends will be envious.
� Mark Papas Grand Unification Theory p.11 /11